Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the cancellation of the sales tax registration certificate could be sustained when the dealer was not afforded a personal hearing under the statute, and whether the existence of a revisional remedy barred the writ petitions.
Analysis: The statutory scheme empowered the prescribed authority to cancel a registration certificate for good and sufficient reasons, but expressly prohibited action under the cancellation power unless the dealer had been given an opportunity of being heard. The record showed that only notice and objections were exchanged, and no personal hearing was afforded before cancellation. The Court applied the settled rule that where a statute prescribes the manner of doing an act, it must be done in that manner or not at all, particularly where the power exercised is drastic and has serious civil consequences. On the objection of alternative remedy, the Court held that revisional jurisdiction does not by itself bar writ jurisdiction, especially where the impugned order is vitiated by breach of mandatory procedure and violation of natural justice.
Conclusion: The cancellation order was unsustainable for breach of the mandatory requirement of personal hearing, and the writ petitions were maintainable notwithstanding the revisional remedy.