Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the income derived by a company from ownership, letting and management of house property was assessable under the head "property" or as business profits under the head "business".
Analysis: Section 6 of the Income-tax Act, 1922 classified income under distinct heads, including "property" and "business". Section 9 laid down a special and detailed scheme for taxing bona fide annual value of property owned by an assessee, including buildings and lands appurtenant thereto, while Section 10 dealt with profits or gains of business. The company's income arose from ownership of buildings and their curtilage, and the acts of letting, rent collection and ordinary management were merely the steps necessary for enjoying property income. The fact that the owner was a company did not alter the character of the receipt, and authorities dealing with excess profits duty or analogous business concepts were not applicable to displace the specific statutory treatment of house property.
Conclusion: The income was chargeable under Section 9 of the Income-tax Act, 1922 and not under Section 10; the answer was against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: Where income arises from ownership of house property, ordinary management and rent collection incidental to such ownership do not convert the receipt into business profits, and the specific head for property prevails over the general head for business.