Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a memorandum of appeal before the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was valid when signed by the assessee's duly constituted power-of-attorney agent and, if not, whether the absence of the assessee's signature was a curable defect permitting amendment to relate back to the date of filing.
Analysis: The power-of-attorney was construed to authorize the agent to file the appeal and sign the memorandum. Even on the assumption that the authority to sign was deficient, the omission of the assessee's signature was treated as an irregularity rather than an illegality. Such a defect could be cured by amendment, and the amendment would take effect from the date the memorandum was originally filed. The reasoning was supported by analogous principles governing defects in signature in civil procedure.
Conclusion: The memorandum of appeal was valid, and the appeal before the Tribunal could not be rejected as time-barred on the ground of want of the assessee's signature.