TaxTMI Login
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
TaxTMI 
Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Foreign exchange gains on exports qualify for tax exemption under Section 10B of Income Tax Act</h1> <h3>CIT Versus Ramsons Organics Ltd.</h3> The High Court held that income arising from foreign exchange fluctuation should be considered as part of profits derived from exports and eligible for ... - Issues involved: Assessment of income arising from foreign exchange fluctuation u/s 10B of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2007-08.The controversy in the case revolved around the classification of income arising from foreign exchange fluctuation by the Assessing Officer. The assessee claimed that the fluctuation income should be treated as exempt u/s 10B as part of manufacturing activity, while the Assessing Officer held that it should be assessed under the head 'income from other sources'.The Assessing Officer rejected the assessee's claim that income from foreign exchange fluctuation should be treated as part of manufacturing activity exempt u/s 10B. The Assessing Officer emphasized that the fluctuation income is not related to manufacturing or processing activity and should be considered as income from other sources.The CIT(Appeals) examined the case and found that the assessee, a 100% export-oriented unit, recorded export sales in books on the date of consignment dispatch. The difference between actual foreign exchange proceeds received and credited in books was shown as fluctuation income, added to business income if proceeds were more, or subtracted if lower.The High Court disagreed with the Revenue's contention that the fluctuation income should not be assessed as business income/loss derived from exports. The Court emphasized that the fluctuation income directly arises from the export transaction and should be considered part of profits derived from exports, as held in a previous case by the Bombay High Court.The Revenue argued that the export transaction was complete upon raising the invoice and dispatching goods, but the Court rejected this argument. The Court clarified that the transaction is complete only upon actual receipt of sale proceeds in foreign exchange by the Indian assessee, as required by law.In conclusion, the High Court found no merit in the Revenue's appeal and dismissed the case, upholding the assessee's position that the income from foreign exchange fluctuation should be considered as part of profits derived from exports and eligible for exemption/deduction u/s 10B of the Income Tax Act.
TaxTMI 
