Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2011 (9) TMI 996 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal revises income computation, upholds stock additions, dismisses interest charges The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to recompute income based on a revised sale rate and allowing telescoping for ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal revises income computation, upholds stock additions, dismisses interest charges

                          The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to recompute income based on a revised sale rate and allowing telescoping for under invoicing/under billing additions with stock/cash found during the survey. The additions for stock differences and excess cash were upheld, while the interest charges were dismissed as consequential. The retraction of the assessee's statement was rejected due to lack of timely action and substantial evidence from the survey.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Addition on account of under invoicing/under billing of sale of timber.
                          2. Addition on account of alleged difference in stock.
                          3. Addition on account of excess cash found at the time of survey.
                          4. Retraction of the assessee's statement.
                          5. Charging of interest under sections 234A, 234B, 234C, and 234D.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Addition on Account of Under Invoicing/Under Billing of Sale of Timber:
                          The assessee contested the addition of Rs. 14,74,016/- upheld by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) based on the statement of an office assistant, arguing it was arbitrary and unjustified. The survey revealed unaccounted sales and under invoicing, with the office assistant admitting sales were not fully recorded. The Assessing Officer recalculated sales at Rs. 4,36,97,200/- using an average rate of Rs. 800 per cubic foot, while the assessee reported sales of Rs. 2,34,13,736/-. The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the books of account due to discrepancies and directed the Assessing Officer to adopt a sale rate of Rs. 600 per cubic foot, allowing partial relief to the assessee.

                          2. Addition on Account of Alleged Difference in Stock:
                          The survey found discrepancies in stock, with the trading account showing a closing stock of Rs. 1.43 crores versus the physical verification of Rs. 1.54 crores. The assessee's explanation that the trading account was not properly prepared was rejected. The CIT (Appeals) upheld the addition of Rs. 10,77,898/-, and the Tribunal confirmed this, finding no merit in the assessee's retraction and emphasizing the discrepancies found during the survey.

                          3. Addition on Account of Excess Cash Found at the Time of Survey:
                          The survey revealed excess cash of Rs. 33,40,950/-, with the assessee initially surrendering Rs. 30,40,000/- but later reducing it to Rs. 3,23,999/- in the return of income. The CIT (Appeals) and the Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 27,16,001/-, rejecting the assessee's explanation and emphasizing the importance of reconciling cash in business operations. The Tribunal noted the assessee's failure to retract the statement timely and upheld the inclusion of the difference as additional income.

                          4. Retraction of the Assessee's Statement:
                          The assessee argued that the retraction was permissible and justified due to the finalization of the books of account. However, the Tribunal noted the absence of timely retraction and found no merit in the assessee's explanation. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of the statement recorded during the survey, supported by the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court's ruling in Bachittar Singh Vs. CIT, which held that retraction should be at the earliest point of time.

                          5. Charging of Interest Under Sections 234A, 234B, 234C, and 234D:
                          The assessee contested the charging of interest under these sections. The Tribunal noted that this issue was consequential and dismissed the ground, along with a general ground raised by the assessee.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to recompute the income based on a revised sale rate and allowing the benefit of telescoping for additions on account of under invoicing/under billing with the stock/cash found during the survey. The additions on account of difference in stock and excess cash were upheld, and the issue of charging interest was dismissed as consequential. The retraction of the assessee's statement was not accepted due to the lack of timely action and substantial evidence found during the survey.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found