Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the subsidy of Rs. 89,791 received from the Government of India was a taxable trading receipt arising from the assessee's business and thus not exempt under Section 4(3)(vii) of the Income-tax Act, 1922.
Analysis: The receipt had to be judged in the light of the surrounding circumstances and the purpose for which it was paid. The subsidy was not a gratuitous or detached payment; it was granted specifically to compensate the assessee for additional wage expenditure imposed in the course of carrying on its sugar business. The payment was made to make good the loss of profits caused by that business expense and was therefore inseparably connected with the conduct of the business. A receipt made to compensate trading loss or to support the carrying on of the trade is a revenue receipt and not a casual or capital receipt.
Conclusion: The subsidy was taxable as income arising from the business and did not fall within the exemption for casual receipts.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered against the assessee, and the subsidy was held includible in taxable business income.
Ratio Decidendi: A payment made by a Government as compensation for business expenditure or loss of profits, where it is directly connected with the conduct of the trade, is a trading receipt chargeable to tax.