Common parlance classification test supports treating bitumen emulsion as bitumen for entry tax liability.

For classification under a tax notification, a commodity is assessed in common and commercial parlance with reference to its use and utility. Applying that test, bitumen emulsion was treated as falling within the notified entry of bitumen (asphalt) because both products serve the same broad purpose in road construction and maintenance. The Court accepted that the revisional authority could include the commodity within the taxable entry, and the levy of entry tax on bitumen emulsion was upheld. The revisional authority's view was affirmed and the civil revision petitions were dismissed.

---

---

Issues: Whether bitumen emulsion falls within the notified entry of bitumen (asphalt) for the purpose of levy of entry tax under the notification issued under the Karnataka Tax on Entry of Goods Act, 1979.

Analysis: The notification treated petroleum products including bitumen (asphalt) as taxable. The decisive test was the manner in which the commodity is understood in common and commercial parlance, read with its use and utility. Bitumen emulsion and bitumen (asphalt) were found to be used for the same broad purpose in road construction and maintenance, and the Court accepted that the revisional authority could treat the notified entry as covering the commodity in question.

Conclusion: The levy of entry tax on bitumen emulsion was upheld and the issue was decided against the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The revisional authority's view was affirmed and the civil revision petitions were dismissed.

Ratio Decidendi: For classification under a tax notification, the commodity must be understood in popular and commercial parlance with reference to its use and utility, and a product falling within that practical identity may be brought within the notified entry.

---