Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to payment of the final reward under the reward policy on the basis that the customs duty dues had been realised by adjustment rather than cash recovery, and whether a writ of mandamus could issue directing such payment.
Analysis: The respondents admitted that the petitioner's information led to detection of the evasion and that a substantial part of the dues had been recovered by adjustment against refund claims. The requirement of actual realisation under the policy was construed pragmatically, and recovery by adjustment was treated as realisation for the purpose of the reward scheme. The case distinguished the precedent relied upon by the respondents on the ground that, unlike that matter, the link between the petitioner's information and the recovery was admitted here. The Court held that, in these circumstances, the authorities could not deny the reward merely because the amount had not been received in cash from the concerned party.
Conclusion: The petitioner was held entitled to the final reward in terms of the policy, and a writ of mandamus was issued directing payment within the stipulated time with interest in default.
Final Conclusion: The petition succeeded and the respondents were directed to release the final reward amount, treating recovery by adjustment as sufficient realisation under the reward scheme.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the informer's information is admitted to have led to recovery of dues, recovery by adjustment can satisfy the policy requirement of actual realisation, and the reward cannot be denied on the narrow ground that cash recovery from the defaulter has not occurred.