Reasoned orders in disciplinary appeals are mandatory; authorities must show application of mind before affirming or enhancing punishment.

In disciplinary proceedings, appellate and revisional authorities cannot mechanically affirm or enhance punishment; they must show application of mind and record at least brief reasons reflecting consideration of the employee's defence and the materials on record. The impugned orders were criticised for merely repeating the charges and endorsing the earlier view, without independent consideration of the enquiry report objection or the merits of the case. Even where a detailed discussion is unnecessary, some reasoned scrutiny is required before confirming or increasing punishment.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellate and revisional authorities were required to apply their mind and indicate brief reasons while affirming and enhancing the punishment imposed in departmental proceedings.

Analysis: The punishment imposed by the original disciplinary authority was enhanced in appeal and revision, but the later orders contained only a narration of the charges and an endorsement of the earlier view. The Tribunal and the High Court found that the appellate and revisional authorities had not independently considered the defence or the materials before them. The record also showed non-supply of the enquiry report, which was treated as a mandatory procedural requirement, and the impugned orders did not reflect consideration of that objection. In departmental proceedings, an authority may affirm an order without detailed discussion, but it must still disclose at least brief reasons showing due consideration of the appeal or revision.

Conclusion: The challenge to the departmental orders failed, and the disciplinary action was not set aside; the respondent succeeded because the authorities were bound to give some reasons and to show application of mind.

Final Conclusion: An appellate or revisional authority in disciplinary matters cannot mechanically endorse or enhance punishment without at least brief reasons demonstrating consideration of the delinquent employee's case.

Ratio Decidendi: Even when affirming an order in disciplinary proceedings, an appellate or revisional authority must show application of mind and indicate brief reasons sufficient to reveal that the appeal or revision was considered on the merits.

---