Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a transfer of immovable property made for consideration by a person who represents that he has a present transferable interest, but who in fact has only a spes successionis, is protected by Section 43 of the Transfer of Property Act, notwithstanding the prohibition in Section 6(a).
Analysis: Section 43 was held to apply where the transferor, though lacking title at the time of transfer, represented that he was authorised to transfer the property and the transferee acted on that representation for consideration. The two provisions were treated as operating in different fields: Section 6(a) prohibits the transfer of a mere chance of succession, while Section 43 embodies the equitable rule that a transfer shall attach to the title later acquired by the transferor when the transferee has relied on the representation. The illustration to Section 43 was treated as consistent with this construction, and the contrary view that Section 43 could never apply to a case of spes successionis was rejected.
Conclusion: Section 43 applies to such a transfer where the transferee took for consideration on the faith of the representation. The respondents' title prevailed, and the appellant had no enforceable claim.
Ratio Decidendi: A transfer for consideration made on the transferee's reliance on a false representation of present title can attract Section 43 even if the transferor then has only a spes successionis, because the section operates by estoppel and the later-acquired interest feeds the earlier transfer.