Preventive detention requires a reasoned opportunity to examine willing rebuttal witnesses before the Advisory Board.

In preventive detention proceedings, a detenu who specifically requests permission to examine present and willing rebuttal witnesses before the Advisory Board must be afforded that opportunity unless a lawful basis for refusal exists. An unreasoned rejection of such a request by the Board or the detaining authorities deprives the detenu of an effective hearing and prejudices the defence. The article states that denial of the request without reasons vitiated the detention order and the detention could not be sustained.

---

---

Issues: Whether the detenu had a right to examine witnesses present and willing to testify in rebuttal before the Advisory Board, and whether denial of that request without reasons vitiated the detention order.

Analysis: The detenu made a written request before the Advisory Board to examine a named witness who was waiting outside to rebut the detention grounds. The request was rejected without any reason by the Advisory Board or by the detaining and confirming authorities. The governing principle, drawn from the established line of preventive detention decisions, is that where a detenu specifically seeks to produce rebuttal witnesses who are present and willing, the Board must afford that opportunity unless a lawful basis exists to deny it. Unreasoned refusal of such a request deprives the detenu of an effective opportunity of defence and prejudices the hearing.

Conclusion: Denial of the request to examine rebuttal witnesses without assigning reasons was unlawful and rendered the detention order vitiated.

Final Conclusion: The detention could not be sustained, and the detenu was entitled to be released forthwith if not required in any other case.

Ratio Decidendi: In preventive detention proceedings, when a detenu specifically requests permission to examine present and willing rebuttal witnesses before the Advisory Board, refusal of that request without reasons violates the detenu's right to an effective hearing and vitiates the detention.

---