Low tax effect barred the revenue's appeal, as CBDT monetary limits applied to pending Tribunal matters.

Low tax effect barred the revenue's Tribunal appeal because the disputed tax was below the applicable monetary limit for departmental appeals, and the relevant CBDT instruction was treated as applicable even to pending appeals under jurisdictional High Court precedent. On that basis, the ITAT held that the appeal could not be entertained and dismissed it without examining the merits.

---

---

Issues: Whether the revenue's appeal was maintainable in view of the low tax effect and the monetary limit prescribed by the applicable CBDT instruction, including its applicability to pending appeals.

Analysis: The tax effect was found to be below the prescribed threshold of Rs. 3 lakhs for appeals before the Tribunal. The applicable instruction revised the monetary limits for departmental appeals, and the jurisdictional High Court precedent held that such instructions apply even to pending appeals. Following that precedent, the appeal could not be entertained on account of the low tax effect.

Conclusion: The appeal was not maintainable and was dismissed without examination of the merits, in favour of the assessee.

---