1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Interpretation of Madras Agriculturists Relief Act: Judgment debtors can seek scaling down post-commencement.</h1> The Supreme Court interpreted Section 19 of the Madras Agriculturists Relief Act, 1938, allowing judgment debtors to apply for scaling down even after the ... - Issues:- Interpretation of Section 19 of the Madras Agriculturists Relief Act, 1938- Definition of 'debt' under the Act- Application of Madras Act XXIII of 1948 to pending decrees- Effect of depositing money in court for stay of execution on decree satisfactionInterpretation of Section 19 of the Act:The case involved the interpretation of Section 19 of the Madras Agriculturists Relief Act, 1938, which allowed for the scaling down of decrees for repayment of debts. The court analyzed the provisions of the Act and held that a judgment debtor could apply for scaling down even after the commencement of the Act if certain conditions were met.Definition of 'Debt' under the Act:The court examined the definition of 'debt' under the Act, which encompassed any liability in cash or kind due from an agriculturist, except for specified exceptions. The wide interpretation of the term 'debt' was crucial in determining the applicability of the Act to the case at hand.Application of Madras Act XXIII of 1948:The court considered the application of Madras Act XXIII of 1948 to pending decrees and whether the deposit of the full decree amount in court before the Act's commencement precluded the judgment debtors from seeking scaling down. The court analyzed relevant precedents to determine the impact of such deposits on the satisfaction of decrees.Effect of depositing money in court for stay of execution:A significant issue in the case was the effect of depositing money in court for a stay of execution on the satisfaction of the decree. The court deliberated on whether such deposits transferred title to the money to the decree holder or merely served as security, ultimately impacting the rights of the judgment debtors in case of appeal success.In conclusion, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court's order and restoring that of the Subordinate Judge. The respondent was directed to pay the costs of the appeal. The judgment provided crucial insights into the interpretation of relevant legal provisions and their application to the specific circumstances of the case.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
