Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether dismissal in limine of a petition under Article 226 or Article 227 of the Constitution is a judgment of affirmance for the purpose of Article 133(1)(a) of the Constitution, and whether the certificate granted by the High Court was competent.
Analysis: An order amounts to affirmance only where the superior court has applied its mind to the merits and upheld the decision below. A summary dismissal of a writ petition in limine is merely a refusal to exercise jurisdiction and is not a decision on appeal or an affirming judgment. The proceeding under Article 226 or Article 227 is not an appeal, and the principles governing appeals dismissed for non-prosecution or as incompetent support the view that such a dismissal does not amount to affirmance. Since Article 133 is not controlled by the appellate provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, the High Court order, though summary, was a final order in a civil proceeding and did not bar a certificate.
Conclusion: The certificate under Article 133(1)(a) was competent, and the preliminary objection failed.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition had been dismissed without a reasoned adjudication on merits, so the matter was sent back to the High Court for fresh disposal by a speaking order.
Ratio Decidendi: A summary dismissal of a writ petition in limine under Article 226 or Article 227 is not a judgment of affirmance and does not preclude a certificate under Article 133(1)(a) where no merits decision has been rendered.