1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal in the case with citation 2010 (7) TMI 995.</h1> The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal in the case with citation 2010 (7) TMI 995. - 2010 (260) E.L.T. A83 (SC) Cenvat/Modvat β Documents for availing credit - Rule 9(2) of the CER (sic) that, credit shall not be denied on the ground that the document does not contain all the particulars required to be contained under these Rules if the document gives details of payment of duty or Service Tax, Description of the Goods, Assessable Value, Name and Address of the factory of the receiver - the decision in the case of CCE. & C., VADODARA-II Versus EUPEC-WELSPUN PIPE COATINGS INDIA LTD. [2009 (12) TMI 561 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT] contested - Held that: - Appeal dismissed. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal in the case with citation 2010 (7) TMI 995. Justices D.K. Jain and H.L. Dattu presided over the order.