Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants were entitled to unconditional stay and waiver of pre-deposit in respect of duty demanded on cement cleared for export, in view of the earlier Tribunal order holding that Sl. No. 1(C) of the relevant exemption notification applied to such clearances.
Analysis: The appeals arose from demands raised on the basis that Sl. No. 1(A) of the notification was inapplicable to export clearances. At the stay stage, the parties accepted that an earlier Tribunal order had already held that Sl. No. 1(C) was the appropriate serial number for cement cleared for export. Following that prior order, and noting that no detailed calculation had been placed to show any surviving differential liability, the Tribunal found a prima facie case for grant of relief and dispensed with the condition of pre-deposit.
Conclusion: The appellants were entitled to unconditional stay and waiver of pre-deposit.