TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court sets aside order, directs fresh notice for assessment revision, allows all grounds. Respondent to consider objections.</h1> <h3>Tvl. Shanmugam Stores, Versus The Commercial Tax Officer,</h3> The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the impugned order issued without proper notice. The respondent was directed to issue a fresh ... - Issues involved: Lack of pre-revision notice, authority of respondent to pass impugned order, limitation prescribed under Section 55 of Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959.Impugned Order without Pre-Revision Notice:The petitioner's counsel argued that the impugned order dated 03.09.2009 was passed without issuing a pre-revision notice to the petitioner. It was contended that the respondent lacked the authority to revise the earlier assessment order made on 23.09.2004 for the assessment year 2003-2004, as it exceeded the limitation prescribed under Section 55 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959.Admission by Respondent's Counsel:In response, the respondent's counsel admitted that the impugned order of 03.09.2009 was indeed issued without a proper notice to the petitioner as required under Section 55 of the Act. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside. The respondent was directed to issue a fresh notice to the petitioner in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Act to revise the assessment order dated 23.09.2004 for the assessment year 2003-2004. The petitioner was instructed to raise all available grounds, including the limitation aspect, in its objections upon receiving the fresh notice.Court's Decision:The court ordered the writ petition in favor of the petitioner, directing that no costs be imposed. Additionally, the connected M.P.No.1 of 2012 was closed as a result of the judgment. The respondent was instructed to issue a fresh notice to the petitioner for revising the assessment order, and upon receiving objections from the petitioner, the respondent was required to consider and pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law and the objections raised by the petitioner.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
