Municipal transitory provisions and property transfer power upheld, with continuity in office and lawful sale of municipal land.

A municipal transitory provision was read harmoniously with the election scheme to preserve continuity of the deemed committee until the first meeting of the body elected under the new Act; the members did not vacate office merely on expiry of three years. The Act was also construed to confer express authority to transfer municipal property, so land acquired for municipal purposes could be sold to third parties if the statutory safeguards of special resolution, prescribed rules, and any required sanction were met. The prior vesting provision did not create an implied bar on alienation, and the sale was upheld as intra vires.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the members of the Municipal Committee constituted under the repealed enactment continued in office under the transitory provision until a first meeting could be called under the new Act. (ii) Whether the Municipal Committee had power to sell immovable property acquired for municipal purposes to third parties under the new Act.

Issue (i): Whether the members of the Municipal Committee constituted under the repealed enactment continued in office under the transitory provision until a first meeting could be called under the new Act.

Analysis: The transitory clause deemed the earlier committee to be constituted under the new Act and permitted its members to continue until the first meeting under the election machinery of the new Act. The election provisions were construed harmoniously so that the scheme of the Act did not become unworkable or futile. The first general election was held to be capable of being conducted without defeating the legislative intent, and the continuation of the old committee was treated as temporary until a duly elected body could assume office.

Conclusion: The members of the deemed committee did not cease to hold office merely by efflux of three years from the commencement of the Act; they continued until the first meeting of the committee elected under the new Act.

Issue (ii): Whether the Municipal Committee had power to sell immovable property acquired for municipal purposes to third parties under the new Act.

Analysis: The provisions dealing with vesting and transfer of municipal property were read together with the express transfer power conferred by the Act. Section 77 was treated as an enabling provision, subject to the statutory conditions of a special resolution, compliance with the rules, and, where relevant, governmental sanction. The earlier vesting provision did not impliedly prohibit alienation to private parties, and the sale was within the statutory power once the prescribed safeguards were satisfied.

Conclusion: The Municipal Committee had statutory authority to sell the land, and the impugned alienation was not ultra vires.

Final Conclusion: The challenge to the committee's continuance in office and to the sale of the municipal land failed, and the dismissal of the appeal was affirmed.

Ratio Decidendi: A transitory provision in a municipal statute must be construed harmoniously with the election scheme so as to preserve the first election and temporary continuation of the old committee, and an express statutory power to transfer property, subject to prescribed conditions, excludes any inconsistent implied prohibition.

---