Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest income credited to the profit and loss account of a firm and accepted as business income could be excluded from book profit while computing the ceiling for remuneration payable to partners under section 40(b).
Analysis: The firm had earned interest on fixed deposits, net of interest paid on borrowings, and the amount stood credited to the profit and loss account and assessed as business income. The dispute turned on whether, for the purpose of Explanation 3 to section 40(b), the net profit as shown in the profit and loss account could be dissected by excluding such interest income. Following the co-ordinate bench decisions relied upon, the Tribunal held that the net profit of a firm is not to be split into different heads of income under section 14 for computing book profit under section 40(b), and that interest income forming part of the profit and loss account cannot be excluded merely because it is separately characterised.
Conclusion: The interest income remained part of the book profit for computing permissible partner remuneration, and the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer was not sustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: For computing book profit under section 40(b), the entire net profit as reflected in the firm's profit and loss account, including interest income forming part of that account, is to be taken into consideration without reclassifying or excluding it under other heads of income.