Forest produce regulation treats factory-made kattha as catechu, so transit pass requirements apply under the U.P. rules.

Catechu or factory-made kattha remains "forest produce" under Section 2(4) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, because the definition is inclusive and covers catechu whether or not it is found in or brought from a forest. Mechanical or industrial processing of khair wood does not alter that character, and the distinction between cottage-industry kattha and mill-made kattha is immaterial for the Act. The U.P. Transit of Timber and other Forest Produce Rules, 1978 validly regulate transit of forest produce and may require a transit pass, and the challenge to their validity was not pursued.

---

---

Issues: Whether factory-made kattha or catechu is a forest produce within the meaning of Section 2(4) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, and whether its movement in transit required a transit pass under the U.P. Transit of Timber and other Forest Produce Rules, 1978.

Analysis: The definition of forest produce in Section 2(4) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 is inclusive and covers catechu whether found in or brought from a forest or not. The Court held that factory-made kattha remains catechu and does not cease to be a forest produce merely because khair wood is subjected to a mechanical or industrial process. The distinction suggested between cottage-industry kattha and mill-made kattha was found immaterial for the purposes of the Act. The scheme of Chapter VIII and Chapter VIII-A of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 and the U.P. Transit of Timber and other Forest Produce Rules, 1978 showed that the State may regulate transit of forest produce and require a transit pass. The challenge to the vires of the Rules was not pressed, and the Rules were held to be validly enacted to prevent illegal exploitation of forest produce and ecological imbalance.

Conclusion: Factory-made kattha or catechu is forest produce, and transit regulation including the requirement of a transit pass applies to it.

---