Reversal of input credit and exemption eligibility under Notification No. 30/2004-CE required fresh examination.

Reversal of common input credit was examined against the exemption condition barring availment of Cenvat credit under Notification No. 30/2004-CE. The denial of exemption rested on the timing of reversal and an alleged mismatch between the credit originally taken and the amount reversed. Relying on earlier decisions that reversal before utilisation may be treated as equivalent to non-availment, the Tribunal found the issue required reconsideration. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner for fresh decision, with liberty to the assessee to prove the quantum of credit reversed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the benefit of exemption under Notification No. 30/2004-CE could be denied merely because the credit taken on common inputs was reversed after clearance and whether the reversed credit was shown to be equivalent to the credit originally availed.

Analysis: The dispute centred on the effect of reversal of input credit in relation to the condition in the exemption notification prohibiting availment of credit. The Tribunal noted that the denial of exemption was based on two grounds: that the reversal was made after some delay and that the reversed amount was said not to match the credit taken. Since the appellants relied on the law declared in earlier decisions that reversal of credit before utilization may be treated as equivalent to non-availment, and also sought an opportunity to establish the correctness of the quantum reversed, the matter required re-examination in light of the governing legal position.

Conclusion: The matter was remanded to the Commissioner for fresh decision on the disputed issue, with liberty to the appellants to establish the quantum of credit reversed.

---