Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether reassessment under section 21 of the U. P. Sales Tax Act was justified on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.
Analysis: The survey report was already on the assessment record at the time of the regular assessment. The factual finding accepted by the revisional authority was that the survey had not been totally ignored in the original assessment. On that footing, the assessing authority could not reopen the assessment merely because it later took a different view about the significance or effect of the survey material. A mere change of opinion did not constitute the statutory basis required for reopening.
Conclusion: Reassessment under section 21 was not justified and the reopening lacked jurisdiction.