Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, under Rule 4 of the Karnataka Medical Colleges (Selection of Candidates for Admission) Rules, 1984, a candidate could claim the special category reserved for sons of political sufferers or freedom fighters by relying only on the parent's participation in the freedom movement, without satisfying the further requirement of suffering specified in the rule.
Analysis: The rule was construed as creating a special reservation for identifiable political sufferers whose children were intended to receive the benefit because of the disadvantages flowing from the parent's suffering. The expression "and" in the definition was held to be cumulative and not disjunctive. Reading clause (a) independently of clause (b) would reduce the condition of actual suffering to mere participation and would defeat the object and rationale of the rule. The Court therefore applied a reasonable and purposive construction rather than a purely grammatical one.
Conclusion: The special category claim was not established on the appellant's interpretation of the rule, and the certificate for appeal was unwarranted.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a reservation rule defines a political sufferer by reference to participation coupled with specified suffering, the conditions must be read cumulatively so that the benefit is confined to persons who satisfy the full definition.