TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicants had been duly served with notice in the special leave petitions and whether fresh notice was required after leave was granted before proceeding with the appeals.
Analysis: The Court examined the records of dasti service and registered post acknowledgments and found that the applicants had been served in the special leave petitions. It further relied on the proviso to Rule 11 of Order XVI of the Supreme Court Rules, 1966, which dispenses with further notice after lodging of the appeal where the respondent had already been served, had entered caveat, or had taken notice.
Conclusion: The applicants were held to have been duly served, and no fresh notice was required after leave was granted.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
