Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the deduction under section 36(1)(viii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, is to be computed before making any deduction under Chapter VI-A and before any deduction under section 36(1)(viii) itself. (ii) Whether interest on amounts involved in litigation, in the case of an assessee following the hybrid system of accounting, could be treated as income on accrual basis.
Issue (i): Whether the deduction under section 36(1)(viii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, is to be computed before making any deduction under Chapter VI-A and before any deduction under section 36(1)(viii) itself.
Analysis: Section 36(1)(viii) provides for deduction with reference to the total income computed before making any deduction under Chapter VI-A. The provision is a self-contained exception and the deduction is to be worked out on the gross total income basis contemplated by that clause. The later amendment by the Finance Act, 1985, also supports the legislative scheme that the amount is to be computed before deductions under Chapter VI-A and the clause itself.
Conclusion: The deduction under section 36(1)(viii) is to be computed before making any deduction under Chapter VI-A and before any deduction under section 36(1)(viii) itself, in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether interest on amounts involved in litigation, in the case of an assessee following the hybrid system of accounting, could be treated as income on accrual basis.
Analysis: The assessee had consistently followed the hybrid system of accounting, which had been accepted in earlier years. The disputed interest related to amounts where recovery of even the principal was doubtful and litigation was pending. In such circumstances, the claimed interest was treated as unreal or illusory income and, on the facts, could not be brought to tax on accrual basis.
Conclusion: The interest on amounts involved in litigation could not be treated as income of the assessee, in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: Both referred questions were answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue, and the reference stood concluded accordingly.
Ratio Decidendi: For section 36(1)(viii), the relevant base is the total income computed before Chapter VI-A deductions, and not after them; further, unreal or highly uncertain interest on disputed recoveries may be excluded where the assessee consistently follows a hybrid system of accounting.