Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether addition on account of share application money was justified when the assessee produced the shareholders' bank accounts, incorporation certificates and income-tax returns, and whether any substantial question of law arose in the revenue's appeal.
Analysis: The assessee furnished material establishing the identity and genuineness of the subscribing companies. The only basis for addition was that cash had been deposited in their bank accounts before cheques were issued to the assessee. On these facts, the assessee had discharged its burden. If the subscribing companies had received cash and deposited it in their accounts, it was for the tax department to proceed against those companies. In light of the principle applied in Lovely Exports, no substantial question of law arose.
Conclusion: The addition was not sustainable and the revenue's appeal failed.
Final Conclusion: The decision affirms that once the assessee establishes the identity and genuineness of share subscribers, the mere source of deposits in their bank accounts does not justify addition against the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the assessee proves the identity and genuineness of share subscribers, any unexplained cash deposit in the subscribers' bank accounts is a matter for action against those subscribers and not a basis for addition in the assessee's hands.