Refusal to add new goods to an eligibility certificate is appealable as a denial of eligibility in substance.

An order refusing amendment of an eligibility certificate to add new goods is treated as a refusal of eligibility for those goods in substance. Section 10(2) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act was held broad enough to cover an appeal against such refusal, because denying appellate remedy would leave the assessee without a statutory forum and undermine the provision's purpose. The appeal was therefore maintainable, and the contrary view of the Tribunal was incorrect.

---

---

Issues: Whether an appeal under Section 10(2) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act is maintainable against an order refusing amendment of an eligibility certificate by addition of new goods.

Analysis: An application seeking amendment of an eligibility certificate to include additional goods was treated as, in substance, a request for grant of eligibility in respect of those new goods. The scope of Section 10(2) was held to be wide enough to cover an order refusing such addition, because a contrary view would leave the assessee without a statutory remedy and would defeat the purpose of the appellate provision.

Conclusion: The appeal was maintainable and the Tribunal's view to the contrary was incorrect.

Ratio Decidendi: An order refusing to permit addition of new goods to an existing eligibility certificate is, in substance, an order refusing eligibility in respect of those goods and is appealable under Section 10(2) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act.

---