Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Custodian could determine disputed liability for damages or compensation for use and occupation of evacuee property and recover the amount as arrears of land revenue under Section 48 of the Administration of Evacuee Property Act.
Analysis: Section 48 permits recovery as arrears of land revenue only when the sum is due to the State Government or the Custodian under the Act. The expression "due" was construed to mean a sum that is legally enforceable and admitted or proved to be payable, not a sum that is merely alleged or claimed. Where liability itself is disputed, including disputes about tenancy, period of occupation, rate of compensation, or removal of machinery, the Custodian cannot assume the role of adjudicator. The Act was held not to exclude the jurisdiction of ordinary civil courts or to authorize executive determination of contested civil rights and liabilities. A finality clause does not extend to deciding disputed questions that are not already legally due.
Conclusion: The Custodian had no power to issue a demand for a disputed amount under Section 48, and recovery as arrears of land revenue was impermissible. The challenge succeeded in favour of the petitioner.
Ratio Decidendi: Section 48 authorizes recovery only of sums that are legally due under the Act, and it does not confer power on the Custodian to adjudicate disputed civil liability before resorting to coercive recovery.