Unexplained cash credits and unreliable purchase records justify rejection of books and estimated profit assessment.

Unreliable trading results, defective proof of purchases, and unexplained cash credits can justify rejection of accounts and a reasonable estimate of profits under the proviso to section 13. The accounts were treated as unsafe because the bulk of purchases was not properly proved, the claimed mutton business loss was unsupported by surrounding facts, and the cash credits in the sister's, brother's, personal, and charcoal accounts lacked credible evidence of source or genuineness. On those facts, the books were rejected, the income estimate was upheld, and the references were answered against the assessee.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether there was material to justify rejection of the assessee's accounts and estimation of income under the proviso to section 13. (ii) Whether the cash credits in the names of the sister, the brother, the assessee's personal account, and the charcoal account were genuine.

Issue (i): Whether there was material to justify rejection of the assessee's accounts and estimation of income under the proviso to section 13.

Analysis: The accounts were found unreliable because the bulk of the purchases were not properly proved, the claimed loss in the mutton business was not supported by the surrounding facts, and the unexplained cash credits furnished an additional basis for doubting the book results. On that footing, the authorities were entitled to reject the accounts and make a reasonable estimate of profits under the proviso to section 13.

Conclusion: The rejection of the accounts was justified and the estimate of income was upheld, against the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether the cash credits in the names of the sister, the brother, the assessee's personal account, and the charcoal account were genuine.

Analysis: The Tribunal recorded separate findings that the sister could not have possessed the alleged funds, that the explanation for the assessee's personal credit was not proved, and that the brother's account and the charcoal account were unsupported by reliable evidence of source, withdrawal, or re-deposit. The credits were treated as factitious entries and as unexplained sums brought into the books.

Conclusion: The credits were not genuine and the finding was against the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The references were answered against the assessee, and the Tribunal's rejection of the books and estimated assessment were sustained.

Ratio Decidendi: Unexplained and unsupported cash credits, coupled with unreliable trading results and defects in proof of purchases, can furnish material to reject the accounts and justify a reasonable estimate of profits under the proviso to section 13.

---