TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court Upholds Industrial Tribunal's Consolidated Approach to Dispute Resolution</h1> <h3>NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR CEMENT &BUILDING MATERIALS Versus STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.</h3> The High Court directed the dispute to the Industrial Tribunal to determine if the establishment qualifies as an 'industry' under the Industrial Disputes ... - Issues Involved:The issue involves determining whether the establishment in question qualifies as an 'industry' under the Industrial Disputes Act, leading to a dispute regarding the necessity of certified standing orders under the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946.Comprehensive Details:The appellant, a registered society, contested a petition in the High Court of Punjab & Haryana, where respondent no.3 sought direction for the appellant to have certified standing orders like other industrial establishments. The appellant argued it was not an 'industry' under the Industrial Disputes Act, thus no need for certified standing orders. The High Court directed the dispute to the Industrial Tribunal, questioning the establishment's status as an 'industry.'The Industrial Tribunal framed a preliminary issue on whether the reference was legally valid, which the appellant challenged in the High Court but was dismissed. The Tribunal's jurisdiction is limited to the points specified in the reference order or matters incidental thereto, such as determining if the establishment qualifies as an 'industry.'The Tribunal decided to consider the preliminary issue along with other matters, aiming to prevent delays caused by challenging preliminary decisions in higher courts. Previous court decisions emphasized the need to avoid undue delays in resolving industrial disputes by deciding preliminary and main issues together. The appellant's attempt to prolong the proceedings by raising a preliminary dispute was countered by the Tribunal's decision to address all issues together, a move supported by the High Court and consistent with legal precedents.In conclusion, the High Court's decision to allow the Tribunal to consider all issues together, rather than separately as preliminary matters, aligns with established legal principles. The appeal was dismissed without costs, affirming the Tribunal's approach to prevent unnecessary delays in resolving industrial disputes.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
