TaxTMI Login
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
TaxTMI 
Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeal Dismissed for Non-Compliance with Section 35F</h1> <h3>M/s Rathi Udyog Ltd. Versus Commr. of Central Excise, BBSR II</h3> The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT KOLKATA due to non-compliance with Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellants ... Maintainability of appeal - requirement of pre-deposit - Held that: - appellants did not report the compliance of making pre-deposit of 25% - the appeal is dismissed for non-compliance with the provisions of Section 35F of the Central Excise, Act, 1944 - decided against appellant. The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT KOLKATA for non-compliance with the provisions of Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellants were directed to make a predeposit of 25% of duty within eight weeks, but they did not report compliance as required.
TaxTMI 
