Appeal Dismissed for Non-Compliance with Section 35F The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT KOLKATA due to non-compliance with Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellants ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Appeal Dismissed for Non-Compliance with Section 35F
The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT KOLKATA due to non-compliance with Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellants failed to make the mandated 25% predeposit of duty within the stipulated eight weeks.
The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT KOLKATA for non-compliance with the provisions of Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellants were directed to make a predeposit of 25% of duty within eight weeks, but they did not report compliance as required.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.