TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) What is the true meaning of the criterion of seniority-cum-merit prescribed for promotion to Area Manager/Senior Manager posts in Regional Rural Banks? (ii) Whether the promotion processes adopted by the different banks were in conformity with that criterion.
Issue (i): What is the true meaning of the criterion of seniority-cum-merit prescribed for promotion to Area Manager/Senior Manager posts in Regional Rural Banks?
Analysis: The statutory scheme under the Regional Rural Banks Act, 1976 and the 1988 Rules empowered the Central Government to regulate appointments and promotions. The expression seniority-cum-merit was contrasted with merit-cum-seniority. Seniority-cum-merit gives priority to the senior officer once the minimum necessary merit required for administrative efficiency is satisfied. It does not call for comparative assessment of merit between all eligible officers. The prescribed interview, appraisal and assessment of records are only methods to test whether the minimum standard of merit and fitness exists, not to rank officers by comparative merit.
Conclusion: The criterion of seniority-cum-merit means promotion of the senior eligible officer who satisfies the minimum required merit and fitness, without any comparative merit evaluation.
Issue (ii): Whether the promotion processes adopted by the different banks were in conformity with that criterion.
Analysis: Promotion schemes that allotted substantial marks for interview and performance and resulted in promotion only of those who secured the highest marks were treated as merit-based selection and not as seniority-cum-merit. Such schemes were inconsistent with the Rules where minimum merit alone was to be tested and seniority was then to prevail. On the other hand, where the selection process fixed a minimum qualifying standard for interview or appraisal and thereafter seniority governed the choice among those who satisfied that standard, the process was in conformity with seniority-cum-merit. The Court accordingly upheld the rejection of belated challenges and sustained the quashing of promotion schemes that awarded promotions on comparative merit, while allowing the appeal where the minimum standard approach had been followed.
Conclusion: Promotion schemes based on comparative ranking by marks were invalid, while the scheme that applied a minimum qualifying standard and then respected seniority was valid.
Final Conclusion: The appeals were disposed of with most of the challenged promotions and promotion schemes being disapproved for not following seniority-cum-merit, but the promotion upheld where the bank had applied a minimum merit standard before giving effect to seniority.
Ratio Decidendi: Seniority-cum-merit requires only a minimum threshold of merit and fitness to be assessed, after which seniority must govern promotion; comparative merit ranking is impermissible under that criterion.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
