Appeal Dismissed for Failure to Comply with Export Declaration Requirements

The appeal was dismissed as the appellant, a Merchant Exporter of automobile parts, failed to file a declaration in Form A-2 and obtain an STC code before filing the refund claim for services used in exporting goods, as required by notification no.17/2009-ST. The rejection of the claim was upheld by the Commissioner (Appeals) and the Member (Technical) deemed it appropriate due to the appellant's non-compliance with the mandatory procedural requirements, despite the absence of a show cause notice and personal hearing. The appeal was ultimately dismissed based on the failure to meet the necessary procedural obligations outlined in the notification.

---

---

Issues Involved:
The issue involves the rejection of a refund claim by the Asstt. Commissioner due to the appellant's failure to file a declaration in Form A-2 and obtain an STC code before filing the refund claim, as required by notification no.17/2009-ST dated 7.9.2009.

Refund Claim Rejection:
The appellant, a Merchant Exporter of automobile parts, filed a refund claim for services used in the export of goods. The claim was based on notification no.17/2009-ST exempting certain services subject to conditions. The appellant did not file the mandatory declaration in Form A-2 or obtain an STC code before filing the refund claim. Consequently, the Asstt. Commissioner rejected the claim, which was upheld by the Commissioner (Appeals).

Violation of Procedural Requirements:
The appellant argued that the rejection of the refund claim without a personal hearing amounted to a denial of natural justice. The appellant's counsel contended that the matter should be remanded for a de novo decision after granting a personal hearing. However, the Department reiterated that the appellant failed to comply with the requirement of filing Form A-2 and obtaining an STC code before making the refund claim.

Decision and Rationale:
The Member (Technical) noted that as a Merchant Exporter not registered under the Central Excise Act, the appellant was obligated to file Form A-2 and obtain an STC code before filing the refund claim. Since the appellant did not fulfill these requirements, the rejection of the claim was deemed appropriate. Despite the lack of a show cause notice and personal hearing at the original adjudication stage, the Member held that the non-compliance with filing Form A-2 rendered the refund claim ineligible, thereby justifying the rejection. The appeal was ultimately dismissed based on the failure to meet the mandatory procedural obligations outlined in the notification.

---