Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest could be recovered on tax amounts tendered by cheque within time when the department accepted the cheque, there was no intimation that it was dishonoured, and the assessee was not at fault in the alleged non-encashment.
Analysis: The petitioner had tendered the cheque within time and the department accepted receipt of the cheque and Form IV. The record did not show dishonour of the cheque or any communication to the assessee that the cheque had not been encashed. In such circumstances, the assessee could not be faulted for non-payment, and the departmental procedure under Rules 48 and 49 required proper handling of the cheque and communication of its result. Since the same factual position existed for the subsequent assessment year, the same conclusion followed.
Conclusion: Interest was not recoverable from the assessee on the amounts covered by the timely tendered cheques.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded and the recovery of interest included in the impugned recovery certificate was set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a tax assessee tenders a cheque within time and the department accepts it without showing dishonour or communicating non-encashment, interest cannot be fastened on the assessee for the alleged delay in realization.