TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether, in an assessment to which the proviso to Section 13 of the Income-tax Act applied, the Income-tax Officer was bound to disclose in the assessment order the basis and manner of computation of income and the material on which the estimate was made. (ii) Whether there was material on record to support the estimate of profits at the rates adopted by the Income-tax Officer.
Issue (i): Whether, in an assessment to which the proviso to Section 13 of the Income-tax Act applied, the Income-tax Officer was bound to disclose in the assessment order the basis and manner of computation of income and the material on which the estimate was made.
Analysis: The proviso to Section 13 does not authorise a mere guesswork assessment. Where the Income-tax Officer uses material against the assessee, natural justice requires that the assessee be given an opportunity to meet that material. Since the assessment order is appealable, it must be a speaking order, and disclosure of the basis and manner of computation is necessary to make the right of appeal effective. An estimate under the proviso must therefore rest on a discernible basis and not on an arbitrary leap in the dark.
Conclusion: Yes. The Income-tax Officer was bound to disclose the basis and manner of computation in the assessment order.
Issue (ii): Whether there was material on record to support the estimate of profits at the rates adopted by the Income-tax Officer.
Analysis: The assessment records showed the nature of the business, the character of sales, the absence of quantitative and qualitative details, comparative results of earlier years, and local trading conditions. On that material, the several rates adopted for the different heads of business were treated as reasonable estimates rather than arbitrary additions. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner had scrutinized the figures, and the Tribunal accepted the rates as supportable on the record.
Conclusion: Yes. There was material on record to warrant the estimate of profits at the several rates adopted.
Final Conclusion: The questions referred were answered by holding that the assessment order had to disclose the basis of computation, and that the profit estimates in the present case were supportable on the available material.
Ratio Decidendi: An assessment made under the proviso to Section 13 must be a reasoned and disclosable estimate founded on material, consistent with natural justice and effective appellate review, and not an arbitrary guess.
TaxTMI 
