Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an election petition could be dismissed at the threshold under Section 86 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 for alleged defects not covered by Sections 81, 82 or 117, and whether the question of estoppel and the validity of the rejected ballot papers could be decided without trial.
Analysis: Section 86 permits dismissal in limine only for non-compliance with Sections 81, 82 or 117. A petition cannot be rejected at the threshold merely because it is said to lack material facts under Section 83 or because the returned candidate raises objections as to estoppel. The question whether the election petitioner was precluded from challenging the rejection of the 258 ballot papers, and whether those ballot papers were valid or invalid, required adjudication at the trial stage after evidence and opportunity to both sides. The Tribunal therefore travelled beyond its limited jurisdiction under Section 86 in dismissing the petition before trial.
Conclusion: The threshold dismissal of the election petition was unsustainable and the matter had to proceed to trial on the issues left open.
Ratio Decidendi: An election petition can be dismissed in limine only for the specific statutory grounds under Section 86, and issues going to material facts, estoppel, or the validity of ballot papers must ordinarily be decided at trial.