DFIA import benefit upheld where documentary compliance was shown and no further technical correlation was required at import stage.

Under the DFIA scheme, where the documentary record shows compliance with Notification No. 40/2006-Customs and the Foreign Trade Policy, customs authorities cannot deny the import benefit by insisting on further technical correlation between the imported bearings and the exported resultant product if no contrary material is produced. The Tribunal's finding that the licence conditions and declared input specifications were satisfied was supported by the record, and the Revenue failed to establish any departure from those conditions. The challenge also did not raise any substantial question of law, so the DFIA benefit remained undisturbed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Revenue established that the import of bearings under the DFIA scheme was contrary to Notification No. 40/2006-Customs and the Foreign Trade Policy, and whether the Tribunal's order gave rise to any substantial question of law.

Analysis: The appeal turned on whether the importer had satisfied the notification conditions and the policy requirement regarding the identity and specifications of the imported inputs with the exported resultant product. The Tribunal's findings were supported by the documentary record, and no material was shown to establish that the import departed from the licence conditions or the specifications stated in the authorisation. The Court also accepted the view that, once export was permitted on the basis of the declared input specifications, customs authorities could not insist on further technical correlation at the import stage where the record did not disprove compliance. The reasoning was held to be consistent with the prior binding precedent relied upon.

Conclusion: The Revenue's challenge failed, and no substantial question of law arose.

Final Conclusion: The Tribunal's allowance of the DFIA benefit was left undisturbed, and the appeal was dismissed.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the documentary record supports compliance with the DFIA notification and policy conditions, and no contrary material is shown, customs authorities cannot deny the benefit by demanding additional technical correlation at the import stage, and no substantial question of law arises.

---