Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sale or supply of intra ocular lenses, spectacles and goggles by an eye hospital was exigible to sales tax, and whether the writ appeal could survive in view of the binding Division Bench precedent.
Analysis: The dispute was treated as covered by an earlier Division Bench decision of the same High Court on the tax liability of hospitals in respect of items supplied in the course of treatment. In view of that precedent, the earlier single Judge view did not avail the appellant. The Court also noted that the appellant could pursue the statutory appellate or revisional remedy on other issues arising from the assessment and penalty orders.
Conclusion: The sales tax demand was upheld in principle and the writ appeal was dismissed.