TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the contract was a transferable or non-transferable specific delivery contract within the meaning of the Forward Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1952, and whether it was hit by the Government notification issued under section 15(1) of that Act.
Analysis: The statutory scheme distinguished ready delivery contracts from forward contracts, and further divided forward contracts into transferable and non-transferable specific delivery contracts, with only the latter exempted from the Act's operation. The question whether a contract is transferable or non-transferable depends on a reasonable construction of the instrument, read as a whole and in the light of surrounding circumstances. The absence of an express prohibition on transfer is not conclusive; an implied agreement not to transfer may arise from the terms of the contract and the commercial setting in which it was made. On the facts, the contract was for urgently required jute bags, shipment was to be made in nominated vessels, inspection was to occur before shipment, the consignee and destination were specified, and the contractual setting showed that transfer of rights, liabilities, or the bill of lading was not contemplated by the parties.
Conclusion: The contract was a non-transferable specific delivery contract under section 2(f) of the Forward Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1952 and was not invalidated by the notification issued under section 15(1) of that Act.
Final Conclusion: The High Court's dismissal of the application was upheld and the appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Whether a contract is non-transferable specific delivery depends on its true construction read with surrounding circumstances, and an implied agreement against transfer may be inferred even without an express non-transfer clause.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
