Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the selling dealer could be denied exemption/concessional tax benefit merely because the purchasing dealer was later found not entitled to use the declaration form or not to have been registered for the relevant period.
Analysis: The assessment and appellate record showed that the declaration form relied upon by the selling dealer was genuine and had been issued by the competent authority. The liability of the selling dealer was confined to checking the form for apparent defects and genuineness; it was not required to conduct exhaustive verification of the purchasing dealer's entitlement. If the purchasing dealer wrongly obtained or misused the form, the consequence could not be fastened on the selling dealer. The statutory scheme under section 4-B and the allied rules contemplated exemption where sales were made against a valid recognition certificate and declaration form, and the dealer acting bona fide on such form was protected.
Conclusion: The denial of exemption was not justified, and the revision failed.
Ratio Decidendi: A selling dealer who accepts a genuine statutory declaration form issued by the competent authority cannot be denied exemption solely because the purchasing dealer was later found ineligible or to have misused the form; the seller's duty is limited to reasonable verification of apparent genuineness.