Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal was justified in setting aside the rejection of the refund claim and remanding the matter to the Original Authority for de novo enquiry.
Analysis: The refund claim arose from duty paid on defective imported goods, in respect of which exemption under Customs Notification No. 51/96 was claimed. The lower authorities rejected the claim on the premise that the assessee could not challenge the assessment order and on limitation grounds. The Tribunal, however, interfered with those orders and remanded the matter for fresh consideration. On the record, no error was found in the Tribunal's course of action in remanding the matter for de novo enquiry.
Conclusion: The remand order was upheld and the revenue's challenge failed.