Market fee on agricultural produce turns on where property passes; exemption and schedule entries will not extend to distinct products.

Market fee under the Gujarat Agricultural Produce Markets Act applied to castor seeds purchased and weighed within the market area because the invoices, weighment records and remittance notes showed that property passed only on ascertainment of quantity and payment; Rule 48(2) exemption was unavailable since it applies only to produce brought from outside the market area for industrial use. By contrast, de-oiled cake was held to be a distinct product from oil cake in common parlance and by the manufacturing process, so the scheduled entry for oil cake did not extend to it. The levy on castor seeds was upheld, while the levy on de-oiled cake was not.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether market fee was leviable on castor seeds purchased by the industrial concern within the market area, and whether Rule 48(2) applied to grant exemption; (ii) Whether de-oiled cake was covered by the schedule as oil cake so as to attract market fee.

Issue (i): Whether market fee was leviable on castor seeds purchased by the industrial concern within the market area, and whether Rule 48(2) applied to grant exemption.

Analysis: The levy under Section 28 of the Gujarat Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1963 applied to agricultural produce bought or sold in the market area. On the facts proved by the invoices, weighment records and remittance notes, the castor seeds were found to have been purchased and weighed within the market area, and the property in the goods passed only upon ascertainment of the exact quantity and payment. That brought the transaction within Rule 48(1) of the Gujarat Agricultural Produce Markets Rules, 1965, not Rule 48(2), because the exemption under Rule 48(2) is confined to produce brought from outside the market area into the market area for use therein by an industrial concern.

Conclusion: Market fee was rightly leviable on the castor seeds, and the exemption under Rule 48(2) was not available.

Issue (ii): Whether de-oiled cake was covered by the schedule as oil cake so as to attract market fee.

Analysis: The schedule treated oil cake as an agricultural produce, but the material showed that de-oiled cake was a distinct product obtained after further extraction, leaving less than 1% oil content. Applying the distinction between oil cake and de-oiled cake in common parlance and the accepted legal understanding of the manufacturing process, the scheduled entry for oil cake did not extend to de-oiled cake.

Conclusion: No market fee was leviable on de-oiled cake.

Final Conclusion: The demand for market fee on castor seeds was upheld, while the levy on de-oiled cake was disallowed, and the remitted challenge to the later order was sent back for fresh consideration by the High Court.

Ratio Decidendi: For market-fee purposes, the place where property in agricultural produce passes determines whether the sale is within the market area, and a scheduled entry for one agricultural product does not extend to a distinct by-product unless the statute clearly includes it.

---