Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether deduction under Rule 3(2)(h) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Rules, 2005 could be claimed when the invoices did not separately disclose the rate and amount of tax charged on the taxable goods.
Analysis: Section 9 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 requires a registered dealer liable to pay tax to collect tax at the rate or rates at which it is liable to pay tax, and the Rules contemplate disclosure of the tax rate and tax amount in the tax invoice. The invoices in question showed composite prices inclusive of tax and did not separately reflect the tax component. On that footing, the claimed deduction was not permissible. The penal provision for defective tax invoices did not create a right to claim deduction where the statutory requirement of separate collection and disclosure was not satisfied. A taxing statute had to be applied strictly, and the court declined to read into the provisions any entitlement to bifurcate a composite sale price for deduction in the absence of such disclosure.
Conclusion: The deduction claim was untenable and the revision petitions were dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: Under the Karnataka VAT scheme, deduction of tax from turnover is available only where tax is separately collected and reflected in the invoice in accordance with the Act and Rules.