Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the pre-revision notice proposing reassessment was barred by limitation under Section 16(1)(a) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, and whether the existence of an alternative statutory remedy precluded writ interference.
Analysis: Section 16(1)(a) empowered reassessment of escaped turnover only within five years from the expiry of the year to which the tax related. On the facts, the assessment year had already expired beyond that period when the notice was issued, and the original assessment order had been made before the amendment introduced by Act 22 of 2002. The amended language, which shifted the starting point of limitation to the date of the final assessment order, was held to operate prospectively and could not be applied to sustain a notice issued in respect of a pre-amendment assessment. Since the notice was statutorily time-barred, the existence of an alternate remedy did not bar exercise of writ jurisdiction.
Conclusion: The pre-revision notice was barred by limitation and was quashed. The writ petition was allowed.
Ratio Decidendi: An amended limitation provision governing reassessment cannot be applied retrospectively to a completed assessment made before the amendment, and a time-barred notice may be interfered with in writ jurisdiction notwithstanding an alternative remedy.