Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>High Court remands case to Tribunal for fresh decision under Section 254(2) of Income Tax Act.</h1> <h3>Naresh K. Pahuja Versus The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal & Ors</h3> The High Court of Bombay remanded the case back to the Tribunal for a fresh decision after finding merit in the petitioner's grievance regarding the ... - Issues involved: Challenge to Tribunal's order under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.The High Court of Bombay addressed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the Tribunal's order dated 9th November, 2009, which dismissed the petitioner's application under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The petitioner had previously filed an appeal with the Tribunal, which was dismissed on 10th July, 2007, leading to a miscellaneous application under Section 254(2) that was also dismissed on 11th July, 2008. The Court, in a Division Bench decision on 19th January, 2009, found merit in the petitioner's grievance regarding the Tribunal's failure to fully address the application under Section 254(2), particularly concerning the reliance on certain judgments without providing the petitioner an opportunity to respond and the omission of considering a statement from the donor. Consequently, the Court remanded the proceedings back to the Tribunal for a fresh decision after hearing both parties. The Tribunal's initial judgment had disregarded the donor's statement in relation to gifts received during the assessment year 1995-96, leading to an addition under Section 68 by the Assessing Officer, who deemed the gifts as not genuine.After the Court's remand order, the Tribunal issued a fresh judgment on 9th November, 2009, acknowledging the petitioner's grievances as highlighted in the Court's previous decision. The Tribunal's reconsideration of the matter was essential to ensure a fair and comprehensive assessment of the petitioner's claims and the relevant legal aspects under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.