Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the full annuity of 500, or only the net amount of 225 actually received after deduction of foreign tax, fell to be included in the assessee's total income for assessment purposes.
Analysis: The amount payable under the annuity remained the assessee's income notwithstanding that the payers, under English tax law, retained a part of it to meet the tax chargeable on the annuity. The foreign statutory mechanism merely shifted the machinery of collection to the payer and created a discharge to the annuitant upon payment of the residue; it did not alter the character of the entire annuity as income of the assessee. The deduction at source did not extinguish any part of the debt owing to the assessee, but only satisfied it in the manner prescribed by law. The provisions relied upon in the Indian Act dealing with deduction at source and deemed receipt did not support the contention that only the net amount was income in the assessee's hands.
Conclusion: The full amount of 500 was rightly included in the assessee's total income, and the contention that only 225 was assessable failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an amount is payable as income to an assessee, the fact that a portion is retained by the payer under a foreign statutory tax mechanism does not change the character of the whole amount as the assessee's income for Indian tax purposes.