Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit of Service Tax paid on outward freight for goods delivered at the buyer's premises was admissible in case of FOR destination sales.
Analysis: The dispute concerned freight incurred for delivery of excisable goods at the customer's premises. The governing principle applied was that where the contract is for delivery at the buyer's premises and freight is borne by the manufacturer, the place of removal extends to the buyer's premises. The Board's circular was also relied upon, and the amendment to the definition of input services did not alter the position for FOR sales. The sale terms showed that ownership and risk passed only on delivery at the buyer's premises, making the outward transportation integrally connected with the sale.
Conclusion: Cenvat credit of Service Tax paid on outward freight was admissible, and denial of credit was unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: In FOR destination sales, where freight is borne by the manufacturer and delivery is made at the buyer's premises, the buyer's premises constitute the place of removal for the purpose of Cenvat credit on outward transportation.