Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: New?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other

Select multiple courts at once.

In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: New?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

        <h1>Interpretation of 'loss' under Income-tax Act: Importance of accurate profit and loss accounts</h1> The court addressed the interpretation of 'loss' under Explanation (iv) to section 115J of the Income-tax Act, emphasizing the significance of preparing ... Interpretation of 'loss' under Explanation (iv) to section 115J - Computation of book profit under section 115J - Set-off of carried forward loss or depreciation under clause (b) of the first proviso to section 205(1) of the Companies Act, 1956 - Application of Income-tax Act provisions for carry forward and set-off (sections 32, 70, 71 and 72)Interpretation of 'loss' under Explanation (iv) to section 115J - Computation of book profit under section 115J - Tribunal's interpretation of 'loss' under Explanation (iv) to section 115J is not sustained and the Tribunal erred in mechanically accepting the assessee's revised computation without examining the factual position. - HELD THAT: - The Court held that Explanation (iv) to subsection (1A) of section 115J imports the concept of setoff in terms of clause (b) of the first proviso to section 205(1) of the Companies Act, 1956, i.e., in a given year where there is both loss and depreciation only one of the two-whichever is less-can be set off for working out book profit. The Incometax Act's own provisions govern the treatment of depreciation (section 32) and the carry forward and setoff of losses (sections 70, 71 and 72). The Tribunal, however, accepted the assessee's revised return figure for book profit without scrutinising the Assessing Officer's computation and the underlying accounting/factual materials to ascertain whether carried forward loss or depreciation actually existed for the years in question. Consequently the Tribunal's conclusion could not be sustained without fresh factual verification and application of the correct legal tests under the Incometax Act.Tribunal's interpretation and mechanical acceptance of the revised computation set aside; proper application of Explanation (iv) and Incometax Act provisions required.Set-off of carried forward loss or depreciation under clause (b) of the first proviso to section 205(1) of the Companies Act, 1956 - Application of Income-tax Act provisions for carry forward and set-off (sections 32, 70, 71 and 72) - Loss and/or depreciation cannot be allowed simultaneously for computing book profit; setoff is to be made in a given year either of the loss or depreciation, whichever is less, and the Incometax Act provisions determine carry forward and setoff. - HELD THAT: - The Court endorsed the principle-drawn from clause (b) of the first proviso to section 205(1) as incorporated in Explanation (iv)-that a company in preparing profit and loss account for section 115J must allow either the amount of loss or the amount of depreciation (whichever is less) against profit in the relevant year; both cannot be availed in tandem. The judgment emphasises that while depreciation may be allowed under section 32 until exhausted, the treatment of losses for carry forward and setoff must be in accordance with sections 70 to 72 of the Incometax Act. The Tribunal had not applied these principles to the facts and accounts for the years under consideration.The correct legal principle governing setoff is stated and the matter requires application of that principle to the factual record.Computation of book profit under section 115J - Remand for factual verification of carried forward loss/depreciation - The Tribunal's order accepting the assessee's revised computation for book profit without examining whether carried forward loss or depreciation existed for the accounting years 1986-87 and 1987-88 is set aside and the matter is remanded to the Tribunal for fresh determination. - HELD THAT: - On the material before the Court the Assessing Officer had prepared a working showing profits and losses across accounting years and, on that basis, recorded that during 1986-87 and 1987-88 there was no carried forward loss or depreciation as claimed in the revised computation. The Tribunal failed to address this factual contradiction and adopted the revised return figure mechanically. The High Court therefore set aside the Tribunal's order and directed that the Tribunal should apply the legal principles identified in this judgment and reexamine the factual record to work out correctly the loss or depreciation (if any) and thereafter compute book profit under section 115J.Order of the Tribunal set aside; remitted to the Tribunal to determine, on the factual record and in accordance with the law, the correct loss/depreciation and compute book profit.Final Conclusion: The Tribunal's acceptance of the assessee's revised computation of book profit for assessment year 1988-89 is set aside. The High Court states the correct legal principles governing the treatment of loss and depreciation under Explanation (iv) to section 115J (with reference to clause (b) of the first proviso to section 205(1) of the Companies Act) and the applicability of Incometax Act provisions for carry forward and setoff, and remands the matter to the Tribunal for fresh factual verification and recomputation of loss/depreciation and book profit in accordance with these principles. Issues:Interpretation of 'loss' under Explanation (iv) to section 115J of the Income-tax Act, 1961.Consideration of cumulative loss and unabsorbed depreciation for all preceding assessment years under sections 205(1)(b) and 205(2) of the Companies Act, 1956.Determination of taxable book profits under section 115J of the Income-tax Act.Interpretation of 'Loss' under Explanation (iv) to section 115J:The case involved questions regarding the interpretation of 'loss' under Explanation (iv) to section 115J of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court analyzed the provisions of section 115J which deem the total income of a company to be an amount equal to thirty percent of its book profit if the total income is less than thirty percent of the book profit. The court highlighted the significance of preparing profit and loss account under the Companies Act for computing book profit under section 115J. It discussed the incorporation of clause (b) of the first proviso to section 205 of the Companies Act into the Income-tax Act to determine book profit, emphasizing that only loss or depreciation, whichever is less, can be set off against profits. The court referred to a decision by the Andhra Pradesh High Court which clarified the procedure for computing book profits under section 115J.Consideration of Cumulative Loss and Unabsorbed Depreciation:The court delved into the issue of considering cumulative loss and unabsorbed depreciation for all preceding assessment years under sections 205(1)(b) and 205(2) of the Companies Act, 1956. It examined the computation of book profit by the Assessing Officer, which included profits and losses from various assessment years. The court noted discrepancies in the assessment, where the Assessing Officer did not account for any depreciation or loss during specific years. It pointed out that the Tribunal mechanically accepted the revised computation filed by the assessee without thoroughly examining the factual aspects, particularly regarding carried forward losses. The court emphasized the need for a correct assessment of loss or depreciation for each relevant year to determine the accurate book profit under section 115J.Determination of Taxable Book Profits under section 115J:Lastly, the court addressed the issue of determining taxable book profits under section 115J of the Income-tax Act. It discussed the Tribunal's acceptance of the revised computation filed by the assessee, which led to a different calculation of book profit compared to the Assessing Officer's determination. The court highlighted the importance of correctly assessing losses and profits for each year to arrive at the precise book profit under section 115J. It concluded by setting aside the Tribunal's order and directing a reevaluation of the loss or depreciation to ensure accurate computation of book profit. The court provided a comprehensive analysis of the provisions of the Income-tax Act and the Companies Act to guide the correct determination of taxable book profits under section 115J.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found