Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>High Court affirms Tribunal decision on input service of GTA service for assessee.</h1> <h3>Commissioner Versus Shariff Motors</h3> The High Court of Andhra Pradesh upheld the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal's decision regarding the input service of a GTA service ... Whether CESTAT is correct in holding that the GTA service utilized by the assessee as recipient, is input service for providing the output service i.e., ‘authorized service station’? - Correctness of tribunal order [2009 (3) TMI 155 - CESTAT, BANGLORE] - Held that:- the learned Tribunal has given correct interpretation and this is one possible interpretation and we cannot substitute by another one. Thus, we do not find any element of law involved for admission of this appeal. - Decided against the revenue. The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the appeal against the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal's judgment regarding the input service of a GTA service utilized by the assessee as a recipient for providing output service as an 'authorized service station.' The Court found no legal element involved and upheld the Tribunal's interpretation, stating that there was no need for admission of the appeal.