Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether tobacco dust and tobacco refuse emerging during manufacture could be treated as the final product for denying exemption under Notification No. 214/86 on cut tobacco sent for job work.
Analysis: The appellants were registered manufacturers of cigarettes and the cigarettes were entirely cleared for export. The denial of exemption rested on treating tobacco dust and tobacco refuse arising in the process as the final product. The notification was examined and the core question was whether such by-products could displace the real final product of the manufacturing activity. The reasoning accepted that the final product was cigarettes and not tobacco dust or tobacco refuse.
Conclusion: Tobacco dust and tobacco refuse could not be treated as the final product for the purpose of Notification No. 214/86, and the exemption on cut tobacco was available to the assessee. The demand and penalty were set aside and the appeal was allowed.